O, and no child back in the day would have dreamt of using the infantile “dino” abbreviation.
I’m gonna guess…… John C. Wright.
Close, but it was actually a commenter on Vox Day’s blog. Less incomplete quote:
I loved my “was ist was” (what is what) research book as a boy. It is difficult to find the same level of scientific depth today for 5-8 year old children, it’s as if publishers don’t trust the intellect of children anymore, just because the current crop of young adults is dumbed down nowadays.
*books not book
Had many of those as a boy, including about the moon and the Saturn missions, another one about the solar system including tables of radius, mass, distance to sun (both aphel and perihel, plus average), duration of “planet year” (ie time of full circumnavigation), and so on. All metrics given in both absolute measures (eg, millions of km) as well as in relative Earth-multiples. I knew the entire table by heart, just like the dinosaur stuff.
O, and no child back in the day would have dreamt of using the infantile “dino” abbreviation.
Another book about atoms and their elementary particles…
(via raggedjackscarlet)
