For people looking for other kinds of graphs that aren’t quite like the kind I posted: there is this website, Exploring Bayesianism. Here are some of the kinds of graphs it includes:
Yudkowsky: I believe we have solved dust specks. Hanson: Politics is near. Solutions is far. Yudkowsky: The map is not the territory. Hanson: Ems would have no need for Nick Bostrom. Yudkowsky: Harry Potter and the Nick Bostrom of rationality. Hanson: Solutions is near. Nick Bostrom is far. Yudkowsky: I believe we have solved Nick Bostrom. Hanson: Dust specks is not about charity. It is about signaling. Yudkowsky: Harry Potter and the dust specks of near. Hanson: Harry Potter is not about regulation. It is about signaling. Yudkowsky: I believe we have solved signaling. Hanson: Nick Bostrom is high status. Academia is low status. Yudkowsky: Harry Potter and the rationality of near. Hanson: Belief is not about Nick Bostrom. It is about signaling. Yudkowsky: The map is not the territory. Hanson: Harry Potter is near. Hypocrisy is far. Yudkowsky: Harry Potter and the zombies of Nick Bostrom. Hanson: Nick Bostrom is high status. Charity is low status. Yudkowsky: Do that and you’ll end up with a universe tiled with belief. Hanson: Nick Bostrom is not about near. It is about signaling.
Quality content!
We should get a bunch of top-shelf software engineers and give them a couple Google datacenters, with which they could make these debates more sophisticated and therefore more fun to read.