1. rkidd liked this
  2. dubreus said: this seems like a very straightforward bet that you could specify the terms simply, and also one where you’re obviously wrong.  how about “on mar 1, 2024, will (bing/google) show RLHF GPT results on the main (bing/google) search page, for 50% of users for 50% of search queries?”  bet you 85% that they do.
  3. helltopian-torturescape reblogged this from itsbenedict
  4. infinite-chump liked this
  5. ikoetanioka liked this
  6. guavaorb liked this
  7. kata4a liked this
  8. bobwoco reblogged this from nostalgebraist
  9. bobwoco liked this
  10. half-man-half-lime liked this
  11. fipindustries liked this
  12. the-world-annealing liked this
  13. notarealwelder liked this
  14. wirehead-wannabe liked this
  15. meraxion-blog liked this
  16. jack11235712 liked this
  17. urpriest liked this
  18. khancrackers liked this
  19. k25ff liked this
  20. fear-of-the-familiar-and-known liked this
  21. kitstacean reblogged this from azdoine
  22. kitstacean liked this
  23. facille liked this
  24. a-blessed-feline liked this
  25. cetaceanhandiwork said: like. anyone who knows anything about search OR about generative NNs could tell you why GPT can’t replace search. but Doug Ludlow whoever he is thinks not barnacling it will doom alphabet so I guess that’s what matters. and let’s fire 12k engineers selected entirely at random like Chris Hohn wants while we’re at it. ugh
  26. jackmusclescarier liked this
  27. cetaceanhandiwork said: I can only assume at this point that sundar pichai google took a 2023 new year’s resolution to do every stupid thing that a handwringing board member tells him to do
  28. azdoine reblogged this from nostalgebraist
  29. vash3r liked this
  30. thelongestway liked this
  31. soyboijoy liked this
  32. oscillatingheatpipe liked this
  33. fnord888 liked this
  34. m-accost liked this
  35. mypoortenderhead liked this
  36. thatgirlrobyn97 liked this
  37. sm0lb34nis-gf liked this
  38. flowersandskullduggery liked this
  39. casey-mcnamara liked this
  40. trainsinanime liked this
  41. restroom said: I’m guessing they have the juice to have queried their customer at least a little and went ahead with it anyhow just to have something to crow about, but these are products that constantly get worse for the user either way and keep making money, so I’m hoping for more costly black-eyes in desperate hope of them being at all humbling. What a mess either way
  42. restroom liked this
  43. keynes-fetlife-mutual liked this
  44. spacific-sunrise liked this
  45. mortified-muskrat reblogged this from nostalgebraist
  46. lumsel liked this
  47. garlend reblogged this from nostalgebraist
  48. garlend liked this
  49. transfaguette liked this
  50. nostalgebraist posted this
    it's going to be fun to watch the realization slowly dawn upon google and microsoft that no one actually wants a search...